/lit/ - Literature

>>11741561
>>11741591
interesting, thanks for the feedback anon.

>You could think of it as forming a string to be interpreted by a compiler. Theres care and purpose on every single word being used, and an ulterior functionality to it.
i would agree with this.

>texts in the informational era must first be assessed as a potential weapon if one wants to remain free
very true.

>Its like linguistic acid.
it's probably wrong to be flattered by this, but still, fuck yeah. i've become a theorypusher. giving away questionable hot takes in a seedy cyberpunk bar. an alchemist at last.

>>11741623
i'm not saying i'm against the greeks or that you shouldn't read them. i'm not and you should. obviously you should, and the german idealists also. but this isn't greece, and it isn't the enlightenment either. it's debatable if we are even postmodernists anymore (and if we are, we should get off that ship, asap). that anon isn't wrong, criticism can indeed become the close study of vicious circles.

but that's my point, and it's why i create these threads. machines and technology are changing everything. critiques of late capital really *do* form oroboros loops, but that actually is a useful contribution. the oroboros as a principle of design rather than a bug or a glitch. they mirror their object of study.