/lit/ - Literature

>>10548311
>People being ejected out of their windshield in a car accident hurts my feelings and their loved ones, therefore it should be a law for people to wear their seatbelts.
People being ejected out of their windshield in car accidents also lowers the population, slows traffic, causes property damage, psychologically scars onlookers, etc
There are better reasons than feelings which can be nebulous and trick you into harming yourself. Like voting against gay marriage.

>Why not, I dont want my son to think its ok to be gay. Maybe my son is bisexual, or maybe many males are bisexual, and maybe if there is an aire in society that it is ok to be gay, my son, and other mens sons will be more inclined to pursue that.
It doesn't matter what you want. If your kid is homosexual you have two choices for your kids future: happy, open and self-fufilled versus scared, secretive (especially towards you) and self hating. Would you appreciate your father demanding you fuck another man? There is no evidence that suggests that LGBTQ acceptance tricks heteros into being gay.

>I dont want my friends and family judging me and my son negatively for being gay (and no amount of commericals and rainbow flags and parades are going to stop John Jones and the guys at the bar from bringing up my sons facebook feed and scrolling through it with the bartender and patrons).
This is only an argument for supressing the power of John Jones and teaching your kid the valuable lesson that his life is his own to lead. As acceptance increases which will continue to happen with the normalizing effect of legislation the number of bigots like that will decrease.

>We want to see him have a wife and children, and be like all the normal people. We dont want him to be a weak sissy who cant change a tire or doesnt like camping. We dont want to imagine cum in his ass...the ass we spent so much time and money wiping all those years.
A gay man can be masculine, a lesbian woman be feminine, a bisexual can be faithful, etc. Any queer can raise a family, in fact if you want to see your kid raise a family then in the event that they are gay you should be supporting his right to that.

>The majority of people in the world do not want gayness to exist or be allowed (lets imagine this were true), do the majority of people have the right to enforce the unexistence of gayness?
They have the ability to enforce a supression of LGBTQ people but they won't be able to wholesale eliminate it. And while they would have this ability, it wouldn't make it any more economically viable.

>Or would the right thing be for an or some allotted areas in the world that accept gayness?
That seems like a double standard that will only cost us global wealth.