/lit/ - Literature

>>16768680

Now nothing in the past was Fascism, these guys are beating the commies in the cringe

As you can see on this board, they are all reactionaries, never reslly offer solutions, and hold some fairytale utopian view of what it will be like under Fascism it is very childish in nature, maybe akin to Peter Pan syndrome

Fascists basically yearn for a strong male figure that will solve all of their problems, they can't cope with growing up and thr personal responsibility thst comes with it

>>16652239

I get your view now, well with than type of language, in my example, they wanted to leave the "discrimination related to skill" intact but reduce the "discrimination associated to the trait of being fat that was not related to skill". So notice that in the example, I said there were to reasons for fat people having less money, one being that they lost more games anyway, and this aspect was not remedied in any way only the aspect pertaining to the visits was remedied.

So fat people in my example, would lose more games anyway, that discrimination was not remedied.

With this language. Equality of Opportunity would seek to make the Opportunity more Equal in the sense of trying to limit the discrimination to factors which society correlates to be more in control of the *individual* person. All with the goal that the indivual gets "discriminated" on those factors which society believes he has more personal responsibility for, rather than those outside his grasp.

My original argument is that not all rules applied unevenly among individuals are made to reach an Equality of Outcome, some aim to get closer to an Equality of Opportunity in the sense described above.