/lit/ - Literature

>>17412871
Not really. I'd add Woolf, James and Proust to the 'must know' section, and emphasise reading essays over the biographies and journals they recommended, but overall it's pretty solid. The old greats became great by reading the old greats. Someone who doesn't read, or rarely reads, will never ever ever write a half-decent book.

>>16172744
Supplement your reading with novellas if you need something a bit lighter in length