/lit/ - Literature

>>23334131
You're a real one, anon, thanks

reading rocks

lurk here a bit and figure out what might interest you, then go to your local value village or whatever thrift store and see if they have anything that interests you

welcome fren

>>17468057
Your culture war narrative is falling apart. Who out the idea of its existence into your head? How are they profiting off your fear?

What's the most extreme Buddhism?
What's the most nihilist Buddhism?

>>17366035
Neo-Liberalism? more like Neo-Libercoolism

>>17184482
This reply simply reeks of gee-whizzery

>>16787571
>rapes his sister à la Holden
>gets called "BASED Quen"
the state of /lit/

>>16429049
Based bird poster. When I was a boy the house I grew up in was in a bird sanctuary. We had to have a certain number and type of tree in our yard, and we saw every bird native to Pennsylvania over the years. Now I live near a few nature preserves where I hike and spend my lunch breaks. You’re not autistic.

>>16316995
Why do you care about receiving romantic/sexual validation from women?

>>16321365
Frenly reminder to filter and ignore the faggot butterfly

>>16266738
Do people tell you you're a fucking retard all the time? If so, good news! Chances are that your ideas are way ahead of their time, and people just can't appreciate your superior intellect. Dab on the haters and move on to new heights, Anon.

>>16263551
Go on a 6-mile bike ride down to my favorite coffee place and get coffee, a muffin, and an omelette sandwich if they have any.
It doesn’t get much business, which on one hand means no art hoes to peep at but also a nice and quiet atmosphere.

>>15973568
>>So what would you do in their position?

Sexually assault Jewish women. Yeah.

>>15956920

You have delusions of grandeur and severe lack of impulse control?

Am I Don Quixote too?

>>15886343

>Virginia Woolf is a writer driven by resentment and insignificant, two-bit anglo elitism. You can always tell which writers Woolf owes the most to because she vehemently bad-mouths them at every turn. She couldn't stand that an Irish plebeian did everything she wanted to do in literature 10 years before she developed the awareness to even try. Woolf's attempt to capture the transcendent details, the momentariness of life, and the subjectivity of being human, were all done first in A Portrait of the Artist and killed off in Ulysses. Everything To the Lighthouse tried to do was done in Dubliners and with a more deft hand. All of her stream of consciousness schlock is utter garbage compared to Molly Bloom's soliloquy. Not only this, but Virginia Woolf had no talent for realism. It must have been a sorry day when poor old Virginia realized that she was destined to play second fiddle to Joyce and had no other choice but to write the only thing she could. She could not make the transition to realism. Woolf knew that even if she tried, her writing would never ascend to that Chekhovian beauty and intricacy captured in the work of her former friend Katherine Mansfield. Of course, like Joyce, it didn't take long for Virginia to turn sour on Mansfield. What a laugh that Woolf has been shouldered as some sort of champion of women's lit, when she tore down other talented female writers in an attempt to claw her way to the top. If it were not for the fact that her husband ran a printing house, this woman would be languishing in out of print, 7/10 novels read by mentally challenged fucking retards who believe that reading a British woman whose father and brothers went to Cambridge is somehow progressive and fair-minded.

>Virginia Woolf was a woman driven by envy and poisoned with bitterness. What a colossally derivative fucking harpy cunt.

>>15759240
Thank you for the kind words fren

Cringe thread.

>>15407706

I need more /lit/ pepe reacts and memes.
How can I post here without them

Comfy bump

>>15273538
>me strong aryan wurld builda on anime forum!
>>15273550
*Empties prescription drug bottle*
>>15273545
I more so care about suffering
>>15273557
>probably a greater purpose beyond it
kek, I am the arbitrary one.
And I don't care about licking the boots of nature. If you would ACTUALLY belief that, you would have as MANY children as possible.
Having children is self gratification at the utmost form. Lets not delude ourselves, we all have egos.
>You still can’t refute my statement because you’re a pathetic faggot
Don't let your self hate projection out on me. I explained it in another post.
>>15273588
A person who is free of self-gratification would never think about "spreading muh glorious genes".
>The purpose of life is not happiness
Do you work at a homeless shelter? Even when you would do that you would make some homeless people happy.
>>15273599
what is resource scarcity?
>>15273610
And you are a retarded faggot

>>15235762
>>15235756
>argument for the sake of knowledge is the same as bribery and murder
yikes!

go to bed meletus