/lit/ - Literature

>>22496117
>its just words dancing around unknowns
Intellektuelle Anschauung is real. All talk is just a means to an end you can't get to without the talk ('I am therefore I think' is the correct formulation; descartes got it backwards). Once you see the spiritual sun, the invisible sun, the BLACK SUN, Dionysus, God of the Night, you will behold the world of shadows in the Astral Light. This is the aim of the sage, the goal of the wise, DIE SACHE SELBST.

>>22473199
>i don't think you have a grasp of the difference between sensation and imagination.
I subsume imagination under the concept of sensation (per Kant). There difference lies in the degree of their intensity (reality, tangibility) and that the spontaneity of real sensation is hidden behind the appearance of a receptivity (that they are given rather than produced by you) because of the veil of the empirical ego (they are produced spontaneously by the transcendent Self), whereas the receptivity of imagined sensation is taken for a spontaneity because of a failure to recognize imagination as still being sensation, albeit inner sense of the soul, and therefore still subject to the necessity of the categories, i.e., the emiprical ego doesn't actually spontaneously produce imagined objects, in the same way it doesn't spontaneously produce real object-- both are spontaneously produced by the transcendent Self.

>>22419350
>That only can be called science (wissenschaft) proper whose certainty is apodictic: cognition that can merely contain empirical certainty is only improperly called science.
empirical "science" BTFO