/lit/ - Literature

>>16613761
I don't have a degree in engineering and I don't call myself an engineer. Anyway his career appears to be a long series of disgraces, including a plaigarism scandal, appearing on white power talk radio, and writing essays about the biological basis of "joos bad". Not someone I'm inclined to respect, frankly.

>>16576600
Wut

>>15530533
bait?

>>12757937
Shut up, you knew what OP meant. A monopolistic company has banned a major work because they feel in a moral position to dictate what people should or shouldn't read. I understand banning some bullshit like a guide to make bombs for terrorists because that's directly against the law, but this is an academic work from a respected professor in evolutionary psychology. Amazon banned it because they feel entitled to police what information goes into people's heads, just like Facebook, Twitter, Google and YouTube. Their goal is absolute control over the flow of information.
>private companies can do whatever they like bro
>if you dont like it just start ur own company bro
Yeah let me just set up an alternative to amazon that doesn't ban works that the SPLC deems 'hateful', before swiftly getting banned from all online payment processors like Paypal and getting smeared from the media for being an 'alt right platform'.
>just start your own online payment system bro
>banks won't accept your payment processor? just start your own banking system bro
God I hope all these Silicon Valley companies get smashed up by anti-monopoly laws or become public platforms.