/lit/ - Literature

>>20864167
Socialists found them extremely inadequate from the very start.
And there are no monarchists worth mentioning, so your point is moot. Liberals, world-round, are the standard and rightwing. The American “conservatives” are just sometimes right of them. They’re socially conservative, “Christian”, yet oddly obedient to their billionaire class if they come with an R for Republican. There’s very little separating them, so they get what they all want under a false animosity.

>>20864155
Feminism is also compromised. “Slut walks” and legalized prostitution aren’t feminist issues. They’re liberal issues.

>>20646088
I don’t even care if you believe in any of that bullshit you’re vomiting right now.
Lenin? Royalist? FBI? To hell with you cucks

>>20646143
The nature of the MODERN anarchist comes from the liberty project. Which we all understand comes from deep roots that are both pre-christian and integral to what the carpenter preached. Most fully admit we have no place in telling off the faithful, and accordingly wouldn’t impose any state laws forbidding some worship.

But before I get off on a tangent about the more odious faiths to spring from males, lets just correct this idiotic idea that the absence of faith is a faith. It’s not. If atheism was a religion it would have spread faster and deeper by now

>>20479808