/lit/ - Literature

>>12590840
to assume onthological incompletes in a way answers the question of Theodicy but in a more ecompassing manner.
i will give you an example. lets say you are in a situation where something goes (terribly) wrong. either you blame an outside agent (the jew) or you acknowledge antagonisms which are inherent to the social structure (class divisions etc)
now to go further, in order to account for our failure to grasp reality fully (we cannot explain our observations) either you assume that something exists outside the subject (ding an sich) which somehow only appears in a limited form in order to give the subject freedom (kant's position) or reality itself is always perspectivily distorted and this appearance gives rise to the illusion that there is something behind the veil.