/lit/ - Literature

>>14318666
>>From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs
this is a bombastic procapitalist sentence but marxists say it anyway. . how can you count the abilty of someone?. what this suppose to mean?. if you gonna give more money to the the one with the best ability we would have the same outcome of a ultracompetitive pervasive life like with capitalism.
imagine if an anarcocapitalist say this and how is totally coherent with his views.
>if you dont have x is because you dont have x ability. so you have to accept you gonna have a shitty life. from each according to his ability, remember pal?.

according to his needs?... if we dont presuppose we all have the same needs the entire communist construction is nothing and mean nothing.
"well, im good with this shit salary, i dont think i deserve more". or "i need an hyperhigh salary for cleaning your toilet". who say what is the needs of somebody?. what is the limits of a "need". what is not a need?. its a totally stupid sentence.
marxists should be embarrased but they say it like it was some kind of undeniable slogan of his own wisdom.
maybe in a desperate propagandist marx would have sense to write it, but this is the opposite of what all the left believe and proclaim. and its a trojan horse of the communist movement and they dont even know it.
i totally cope with this stupid shit.
also obvious satanic trips.

>Last book that made you laugh
Last book that made you laugh

>>13029099
thinking about my upcoming trip to ukraine
can't wait to see real people again