/lit/ - Literature

Are there any investigative pieces/books/essays that explore the true nature of picrel's deeds? No Hollywood-ized true crime, pulp fiction type hogwash. I watched the Gacy Tapes and some shit just doesn't add up. Gacy himself can't be guilty of all the murders: he couldn't even fit in the crawlspace, I think Rossi and Cram (who was able to sketch the location of all the bodies) probably did a lot of the murders and burials themselves and knew that they could use Gacy as an easy fall guy given his sodomy conviction. The Tapes intimate this idea but don't develop it any further. But the trail goes even further

1/3

>>22263940
>what in tarnation
>jimeny christmas
>busy as all get-out
>I'm fixin' t'eat
>BBQ sledgehammer
>normative scorekeeping
>inferentially articulated

Are there any good books that would teach me how to more efficiently emulate picrel's behavior? He insisted upon his innocence until the very end (the evidence against was very flimsy at best, Rossi and Szyc probably did most of the killings while Gacy was out running errands for PDM). I mean, how can you effectively defend your innocence when the whole world is against you? Surely there has to be some self-help book that talks about media prejudice and public personality

>>22104890
John Wayne Gacy did nothing wrong.

Are there any good books that would teach me how to more efficiently emulate picrel's behavior? He insisted upon his innocence until the very end (the evidence against was very flimsy at best, Rossi and Szyc probably did most of the killings while Gacy was out running errands for PDM). I mean, how can you effectively defend your innocence when the whole world is against you? Surely there has to be some self-help book that talks about media prejudice and public personality