/lit/ - Literature

>>6841249
>no one wants white people to apologize for being white

Could someone post that extended Christian reading list? The new one, not the "bread pill" one.

>>6702142
>But aren't you doing the same, trying to stop people addressing power structures, as they'll have to wait for the collapse of capitalism?
I think power structures can certainly be addressed, but only insofar as doing so is complimentary to addressing capitalism--for instance, sexism is cancerous to class solidarity, so it is has to be dealt with in that context. But if you make it a concern disconnected capitalism as a problem, it becomes a tool for eroding class solidarity.

>Also, can we even distinguish the Revolution from the Eschaton?
This is Protestant nonsense that tries to equate any improvement of the human condition as trying to play God.

It's a common may may that secular morality is merely an extension of Christian morality, but it surely isn't, because the linchpin of Christian morality is forgiveness, whereas the linchpin of secular morality is excusing. Secular morality is actually as terrible at forgiving as Christian morality is at excusing.

>>6625952
Nah, most feminism today tends toward radical, look at was "radical" entails
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dialectic_of_Sex

Looks like where mainstream feminism is going to wind up

John Milbank said that the Church in its heyday was the conduit between academic and popular. What would be the contemporary conduit? Is there such a conduit? Can such a conduit be created, or have pop culture and academics become irreconcilable?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XN6UNVwlRbk

John Milbank said that the Church in its heyday was the conduit between academic and popular. What would be the contemporary conduit? Is there such a conduit? Can such a conduit be created, or have pop culture and academics become irreconcilable?