[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.17804290 [View]
File: 219 KB, 1200x1632, Samuel_Beckett,_Pic,_1_(cropped).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17804290

WHEN I SAY IRELAND YOU SAY THANK YOU

IRELAND

>> No.11828655 [View]
File: 219 KB, 1200x1632, 1503524431887.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11828655

>>11828641
Sorry, can't hear you over the echoes of eternity

>> No.11172043 [View]
File: 210 KB, 1200x1632, Samuel_Beckett,_Pic,_1_(cropped).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11172043

>> No.11135993 [View]
File: 218 KB, 1200x1632, 4342CA23-57AC-4C93-ACF6-7B1BC3E78E57.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11135993

What are some books that discuss the phenomenology of daydreams? Their content, their repetitions, their effects on life, their fantastical or realistic elements, etc.? I’ve read the book of disquiet and it was great, but I’m not necessarily looking for discussions of existential or superlative daydreaming, just the sort of banal stuff you do like give answers to non-existent interview questions while alone with yourself in the shower. Many of mine involve an element of me being not respected, but envied. I wonder what this says about me, what I can do about it, and what other ways there even are to daydream/think to yourself. I find stream of consciousness inner monologues spurious: I never speak to myself as in, “yum, toast.” I invent scenarios, or replay old ones, and act out a persona (often not my own, but sometimes a fantasy of my future self) that doesn’t reflect experience.

I really didn’t intend to blog here, I would like recommendations that aren’t either the abuse of modernist/post-modernist techniques for “le ebony discussion of language” or angst/pessimistic depression a la Underground man. Something humble.

>> No.11119722 [View]
File: 219 KB, 1200x1632, 1503524431887.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11119722

>>11119719
>The sad thing is that you think you're enlightened when you're just the victim of brainwashing.

Compelling argument

>> No.11096278 [View]
File: 218 KB, 1200x1632, E55D7CAD-1F96-4BD4-BE8E-A0A035EBB81A.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
11096278

gogo.. easy on the carrots

>> No.10986227 [View]
File: 219 KB, 1200x1632, 1503524431887.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10986227

The prose is the plot.

>> No.10502002 [View]
File: 218 KB, 1200x1632, IMG_2225.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10502002

ass

>> No.10264850 [View]
File: 219 KB, 1200x1632, 1503524431887.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10264850

>>10264248
Because History proved that the dead ones did not truly express the Spirit but the living ones still have the potential to be doing so

>> No.10210055 [View]
File: 210 KB, 1200x1632, Samuel_Beckett,_Pic,_1_(cropped).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10210055

>best
Molloy

>worst
various shorter dramatic works

>overrated
Godot

>underrated
How It Is

>> No.9930767 [View]
File: 210 KB, 1200x1632, beckett.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9930767

Joyce is the cancer
Beckett is the answer

>> No.9921641 [View]
File: 210 KB, 1200x1632, Samuel_Beckett,_Pic,_1_(cropped).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9921641

What's your favourite Beckett work and why.

>Relatable
When Beckett told a friend he wished to see everything dead, they replied: "But then who would read your work?"
To this, Beckett grew silent and it struck a chord in him.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]