/lit/ - Literature

>>11428966
>laissez faire quite liberal'
No, because the more egregious the exploitation, the more the aristocracy relies on the state and its monopoly on violence to protect their ill gotten goods. This is in sharp contrast to the left, whose economic doctrine would render the existence of a state to be superfluous and even harmful from an efficiency standpoint. Indeed, sacrifices are offered up in the form of Harvey Weinsteins and Martin Shkrelis when violence is not appropriate as a pressure release mechanism.
>like arent they often quite conservative
This is rooted in religion, plain and simple. A certain socioeconomic philosopher mused that religion is the opiate of the people.
>by proletariat who exactly do you mean
Those that do not own the means of production, whose surplus labour value is extracted at literal and metaphorical gunpoint.