/lit/ - Literature

>>20167378
If you want the strong stuff, you could always try renting out the Hubble or James Webb telescopes :^)

>>20116021
It's not like time ticks without it. Besides, God has gotta be pulling the energy from somewhere. Besides, we can directly look back in the past since light takes time to travel. Pic related is if you look as far back as you can go in every direction. It's the afterglow from when the universe was more hot, compressed, and opaque. We can clearly see a time long before our planet even started forming, so why would it make any sense for the creator of all the cosmos to hyperfocus on a tiny little blue dot? Isn't his scope of shit to do on a much, much higher scale than our tiny, temporary planet?

>>17776879
>The cosmic background radiation is just the chunk loading algorithm glitching out at the edges