/lit/ - Literature

>>11087539
You just prove ought precedes is.
A machine can only see what we program it to see (otherwise it sees everything/can't discern or map anything, or simply doesn't exist cause we don't want it to).
I don't mean something literally doesn't exist, but it only exist to life if it affects life, and the more it matters the more it is.
Like when you focus your vision on an object, it becomes "more-ly".

If it doesn't matter, it's the same as not existing,