/lit/ - Literature

>>16660123
There's no consensus but there a multiple facets to this;
>it's not restricted to traditional values
Although blood and soil is used as a moral caveat, ecofascism is not essentially reactionary. The adoption of biocentric or traditional worldviews is to create an ecological one, and not really for the sole argument of any one system; ethnonational, pagan, or just disgruntled mailman. The reactionary and radical elements all surround the singular goal of an ecological worldview (Ted talks a lot about this).
>what is fascism
The modern political climate isn't the same as modernism, so fascism here really just indicates militancy with an set of virtues alien to the hopes of egalitarianism, humanism, or the enlightement rift between man and nature. The biggest aspect of ecology is that the man-nature dichotomy does not exist, making ecology unconcerned with human rights, quality of life, and enlightement values, which gives it it's fascistic appearance and a misanthropic facade (despite being the most anthro-appreciative branch of politics) with moral addendas made to it.
>>16660659
>sexual frustration
Found another pervert freudian jew, bookchin was firmly against deep ecology and therefore a part of the same delusional fear of catastrophe. You can't prevent the inevitability that human behavior either won't change, or the necessary alterations will only increase violence and worsen conditions. I choose a stable future for humanity, one willing to recognize violence and irreconcilablity as the only outcome for this horrendous time.