/lit/ - Literature

>>18981865
>that image
if you think for more than 2 seconds, this line of argument is obviously wrong. there are at least 3 positions (male, female, non-binary), and 3 =/= 2, so it’s not a binary classification. i don’t even have a dog in this fight, but as a math student it infuriates me when people say shit this stupid. if you’re going to make a reductive argument, at least make the “2 genitals, therefore 2 genders” one. it’s much more defensible.