/lit/ - Literature

>>13197303
>Fine-tuning is an actual physical problem. Thats not what I think, its what physicists think.
ask a few actual physicists whether they think it's likely the universe was fine-tuned for us kek

>>13120821
I don't have a personal definition of God, the word seems to refer to something that interferes or changes certain outcomes, but we can see that that doesn't happen, and there are no other definitions that make much sense either, for example if everything is god then nothing is. To me it's something that statistically speaking is a good indication of a person's intelligence, there have been intelligent theists, but today, for the most part, it's an indication of a lack of intelligence, and no, extremely smart people don't loop back around to religion, the data doesn't indicate that. So to me God is a reflection of a lack of intelligence.

>>12775840
>any of you fucking teeny brained high school educated faggots have any profound takes on theodicy?
At least I have a high school education.
>>12775852
>Second, you have a soul, friend.
>>12775722

>>12677834
First of all:
>In 1633 Galileo Galilei was convicted of grave suspicion of heresy for "following the position of Copernicus, which is contrary to the true sense and authority of Holy Scripture",[143] and was placed under house arrest for the rest of his life.
second of all:
>pic related
The people with the "god-given" gift of intelligence who spend the most time studying this "god-created" universe are usually atheistic