/lit/ - Literature

>>13671192
Fake and gay

Capital cannot lose incel

I don't see why anyone would really oppose g/acc. It has nothing to do with trannies, and it is just as relevant to men as it is women. Incels are the most oppressed group today and if we want to talk about enforced sexuality then there's nothing better than g/acc where you can arrange your own marriage with a robot wife tailored to your specific needs and desires.

This would also mean that you aren't reliant on a bioStacy or some thot who will cuck your genes. You will be able to combine your own high-IQ genes with synthetic crispr Chad genes to ensure that your children have a fighting chance within the hyperhierarchy.
The feminine focus of the language is really just a means of escape from humanist thinking. The Enlightenment is dominated by a false masculinity and g/acc is partly attempting to recover from this. It is as pro-male as it is female or agender.

A necessary step in order to have robots accepted as their own gender, which will also ensure that there are no taboos surrounding the decision of 'beta males' to unleash their own runaway of hypergamy. Women will have to compete with synthetic females just as virgins are getting destroyed by Chads and refugees today.

This is the equation to the noumena of sexual market value for men, just as much as it is a freeing of female spirit.