/lit/ - Literature

>>23478646
I, like all advanced readers here, almost exclusively read /lit/ and and have been doing so for years now whilst only, occasionally, reading actual books.
I've read 2 books so far this year. I read /lit/posts on average for 3 hours a day (equivalent of maybe 25 books worth of posts since the beginning of the year) I pull from a higher level of abstraction. I'm like the CEO of a company and you, my /lit/posters are like my little worker bees working hard in the flower fields drawing knowledge from the books and bringing it back to the hive. I'm the queen who feasts on the honey all day all form the easy comfort of the hive.

>>22236486
I sometimes lose all interest in a book but keep it lingering in my mind with my abnormal keen memory and stay determined to finish it at one point while I keep reading other newer books.

>Last chapter was read on September 2021

>five Bible recommendations
Great literature board guys

>>16961070
>What is all this sweet work worth
>If thou kiss not me?
>*leans for a kiss*

There was this one time where I mistyped the shit out of my post on /tv/. I don't how, I was writing my argument and all, but once I actually posted and I saw the disaster I cringe so hard. Anons started to ask if I had stroke while typing and were laughing. I was so embarrassed I had to samefag, I made post where this anon understood my general point and agreed with me (partially, not to be too obvious. I even expanded on my idea.) And I finish the post by saying, remember to check your post before actually posting it. Then I reply to this post saying yeah I just don't know what happened I was typing and only after posted was when I saw the horrible mistakes.

There was this other anon (not me) who replied, "yeah this happened to before, it's nothing." So that was better.

Bump

>>15018010
>retroactively debunked

The sense of an ending by Julian Barnes.