/lit/ - Literature

Questions for Never-Petersons.

1. Define postmodernism in your own words.

2. Explain why Cultural Marxism isn't real.

3. Quote a single instance of Peterson saying something you personally disagree with, and why you disagree with it.

I'll wait.

>tfw you are at the top of the /lit/ hierarchy.

>>11658508
The United States has "unequivocally benefited" from stealing technological state secrets from Russia and China? I appreciate you posting my thoughts on your post preemptively as not to waste my valuable calories on rewriting the sentiment.

Did someone say ... Peterson.

>>11642411
Well, 99.9% of this boards userbase is male. We can assume this with axiomatic justification. Even in hyperbolic exaggeration, which that was.

Every single time I have ever seen Peterson's work brought up I have yet to see a single person actually discuss the content of his work. Not once. No one who discusses his work has actually read it.

So, men don't understand his work. Perhaps they can't.

Unless of course it's just 4channers who can't understand his work and sex has little to nothing to do with it that isn't blatantly incidental.

>>11639208

I post here, so, obviously.

>>11632102
Respond with condescending critique; in so far as one might apply, justifiably, Hitchens razor to the claims of the ignorant, known by their ignorance, of their ignorance, in service of the dismissal of their ignorance, I will now do so.