/lit/ - Literature

>>23233435
>man makes claim
>pose a question critical of this claim
>"noooo you can't be critical like THAT"
Is it not a valid claim to question his reasoning? Is it not valid to question his position on sexuality while considering the fact that he literally cannot partake in sexuality any more? If not, what is the "proper" way to think critically about this?

Is it really so hard to be an unconditionally better person? Is it really so much to ask to do the will of the god you believe in? You're really going to hear the word of your god and say "uhh well erm I think we should analyze this and maybe think about not being nicer all the time"

Empty bed I lay
The flesh and thick saliva
She swallows, gulp, down

>professor of psychology
>clapping for this

>it's a /v/ on literature thread