/lit/ - Literature

>>10464775
Phenomenology works with phenomena and within the limits of something like a Kantian framework, not speculating about Being, at best formulating some borderline mystical notions of the transcendental.

For Deleuze the noumenon, with what science tells us about "it" (assemblage theory-type criticisms included), is a valid starting point because the need for a practical philosophy takes us through it.

Just because Deleuze has some things in common with phenomenology (quite a few in fact since Merleau-Ponty is an important influence which is rarely mentioned by D&G) doesn't mean that it's the same thing. In this sense Lacan is closer to phenomenology than Deleuze as long as we don't just mean "pertaining to phenomena" when we say phenomenology but rather respect some Husserlian or Heideggerian guidelines (although Heidegger and M-P were a bit more flexible since they did a lot of commentary on speculative philosophers like Bergson or Nietzsche).

What books will teach me to become an emotionless psycho ?
At least something to help me stop becoming a faggot. I really want to know the secret texts that will help me become heartless.

Hey /lit/, it’s /sci/ here. Why do you read fake stories about fake people when you could read real stories about real people, places, scientific advancement, history, etc., that would actually serve you in the world and connect you to the world as it is? Why, essentially, are you wasting your time with this stuff?