/lit/ - Literature

From one of Baron Julius Evola's letters to René Guénon:
“Lo sperma negroide e le sue applicazioni magiche” (1937)
>Concerning Amrita and its applications, it is our opinion that the Negroid sperm has some animalistic magical potency inherent in it which cannot be baulked; thus we see the subconscious longing of white virginal European women lusting after the African male. Hermetic union of opposites, the unification of the bestial and the pure Elements that man constituteth of – body and spirit – black and white, respectively. Of this perfect medicine, it is said that a single dew-drop sufficeth – and this may be true. Yet it is humbly and with all deference and worship our opinion that every drop generated (so far as may be possible) should be consumed as a sacrament. In the same fashion, the Greeks talked of the minotaur, which is a mythological creature half bull and half man. The aim of the priests of that cult seems principally to have been the production of a temporary incarnation of this beast by sending select women of the community every year into the jungle or forest, to mingle with all bestial creatures imaginable; thus to produce a miraculous birth upon returning to the community.

What did Il Barone mean by this?

From one of Baron Julius Evola's letters to René Guénon:
“Lo sperma negroide e le sue applicazioni magiche” (1937)
>Concerning Amrita and its applications, it is our opinion that the Negroid sperm has some animalistic magical potency inherent in it which cannot be baulked; thus we see the subconscious longing of white virginal European women lusting after the African male. Hermetic union of opposites, the unification of the bestial and the pure Elements that man constituteth of – body and spirit – black and white, respectively. Of this perfect medicine, it is said that a single dew-drop sufficeth – and this may be true. Yet it is humbly and with all deference and worship our opinion that every drop generated (so far as may be possible) should be consumed as a sacrament. In the same fashion, the Greeks talked of the minotaur, which is a mythological creature half bull and half man. The aim of the priests of that cult seems principally to have been the production of a temporary incarnation of this beast by sending select women of the community every year into the jungle or forest, to mingle with all bestial creatures imaginable; thus to produce a miraculous birth upon returning to the community.

What did Il Barone mean by this?

How do religious people deal with the expeditions into space? They didn't find God up there.

>>13168901
>It is necessary to distinguish between nationality and nationalism. The Middle Ages knew nationalities but not nationalisms. Nationality is a natural factor that encompasses a certain group of common elementary characteristics that are retained both in the hierarchical differentiation and in the hierarchical participation, which they do not oppose. Therefore, during the Middle Ages, castes, social bodies, and orders were articulated within various nationalities, and while the types of the warrior, noble, merchant, and artisan conformed to the characteristics of this or of that nation, these articulations represented at the same time wider, international units. Hence, the possibility for the members of the same caste who came from different nations to understand each other better than the members of different castes within the same nation.

>Modern nationalism represents, with regard to this, a movement in the opposite direction. Modern nationalism is not based on a natural unity, but on an artificial and centralizing one. The need for this type of unity was increasingly felt at the same time as the natural and healthy sense of nationality was lost and as individuals approached the state of pure quantity, of being merely the masses, after every authentic tradition and qualitative articulation was destroyed. Nationalism acts upon these masses through myths and suggestions that are likely to galvanize them, awaken elementary instincts in them, flatter them with the perspectives and fancies of supremacy, exclusivism, and power. Regardless of its myths, the substance of modern nationalism is not anethnos buta demos, and its prototype always remains the plebeian one produced by the French Revolution.

>This is why nationalism has a double face. It accentuates and elevates to the state of absolute value a particularistic principle; therefore, the possibilities of mutual understanding and cooperation between nations are reduced to a bare minimum, without even considering the forms of leveling guaranteed by modem civilization. What seems to continue here is the same tendency through which the arising of national states corresponded to the disintegration of the European ecumene.

>Even when nationalism speaks of "tradition," it has nothing to do with what used to go by that name in ancient civilizations; it is rather a myth or fictitious continuity based on a minimum common denominator that consists in the mere belonging to a given group. Through the concept of "tradition," nationalism aims at consolidating a collective dimension by placing behind the individual the mythical, deified, and collectivized unity of all those who preceded him. In this sense, Chesterton was right to call this type of tradition "the democracy of the dead." Here the dimension of transcendence, or of what is superior to history, is totally lacking.

- from the so called "super-nazi" that nobody actually reads on this board

Please recommend me a book. Pic related is me. I'm a 70 year-old paraplegic Italian incel who's obsessed with the magical potency of black men's semen. I know, pretty pathetic.

>>13039566
Read Evola

>>13028406
"There are an increasing number of individuals who experience a confused and yet real need for liberation, though they do not know in the name of what. To orient these people, and shield them from the spiritual dangers of the actual world, to lead them to see the truth and sharpen their will to join the ranks of the first type of people is what can still be done. And yet this too affects only a minority, and we should not delude ourselves that in this way there will be sizeable changes in the overall destinies of the multitudes. In any event, this is the only justification for tangible action that can be carried out by men of Tradition living in the modern world, in a milieu with which they have no connection. In order for the abovementioned guiding action to be successful it is necessary to have 'watchers' at hand who will bear witness to the values of Tradition in ever more uncompromising and firm ways, as the antitraditional forces grow in strength. Even though these values today cannot be achieved, it does not mean that they amount to mere 'ideas.' They aremeasures. And when even the elemental capability to measure was totally lost, then the last night would surely fall. Let people of our time talk about these things with condescension as if they were anachronistic and antihistorical; we know that this is an alibi for their defeat. Let us leave modem men to their 'truths' and let us only be concerned about one thing: to keep standing amid a world of ruins."