/lit/ - Literature

>>15422018

>arguing with n*gger logic

C'mon son, you know better than this

>book is written by a woman
>it's about sex

Why are w*men incapable of writing good books, /lit/?

>We Did It Reddit: the thread

I am dissapointed /lit/, even though I should have known better

>>12019998

>I grew up in Canada and was surrounded by Anglo-Saxon and Germanic women
>Canada
>Anglo-Saxon and Germanic women
>mfw

Calm down, Wojtek - your penis envy is showing.

>>12000427

The absolute state of the US

>>11801184

>This is like watching the Superbowl, but for smart people

>>11764605

>trite YA crap
>what's wrong with it?
>mfw

>>11740184

Speak for yourself

Yea, I just remember what I read because I'm not a pleb.

>>11666515
Because women exist in a hierarchy of attractiveness. Surely you're not so naive and beguiled by the ways of woman you can't perceive the existence of such a thing, and infer the properties implicit to it.

Perhaps so.

>Write "woman" in your post.
>Thread gets minimum 300+ responses of socially retarded virgins spewing entitled and delusional opinions regarding a facet of life they admit they have zero practicable experience.

Why are you retards even seriously discussing an out of context troll post?

>90% of active threads are troll questions.
Has anyone else had enough of /lit/ being moderated by incompetent postmodernist buffoons?

>>11649946
>Asides from bettering societies understanding of the nature of suffering and the complex ways in which humans can experience it, what has psychology ever really done?
High standards there, buddy.

>He insults the author and proclaims his arguments are invalid.
>Refuses to offer any articulated reasoning or justification.
>Memes in response to the request.

>>11639768
The assumption was made with intent to demonstrate your lack of capacity for sophisticated introspection to a degree which would allow you to illicit cognitive dissonance upon being presented with an opportunity to either admit you don't understand someone who's ideas you espouse in stupid mockery, or actually read the arguments being put forth, from the author.

>He insults the author instead of critiquing or rebuking the arguments found within their works.
Men disappoint me.

>being so insecure about yourself that you post a screenshot of an Uzbek knitting board of a few reclusive, academic virgins critiquing you

Porn stars are truly the lowest common denominator

>>11560397

Kys

>>10855699

>constantly writes about the ubermensch
>is a soyboy himself

Why do you take this hack seriously, OP?

>book is about sex
>it's written by a woman

Every. Fucking. Time.

>>10777920

>a "philosopher"
>too fucking stupid to wear a condom
>mfw

>>10490029
>>10490012
>>10490004

This is clearly your first day on 4chan, newfriends

>>10484847