/lit/ - Literature

so little Sanskrit activity in this general, not just compared to Greek and Latin for obvious reasons but also other less popular ones

>>20435884
something something....
>I would greatly estimate it, fellows, that you'd be the same sort of judges in my case for this fact/accusation(?) as you'd be to yourselves if you went through the same: in know well in fact that if you held the same opinion about others as you hold for yourselves, it wouldn't be the case(??)

Books about becoming a man? (as a male)

>>14194440
Zeroth-order logic isn't math, you absolute philistine. It's a process that utilizes a terse metalanguage that is logically complete. Perhaps if you spent less time reading pop philosophy garbage peddled to you via bite-sized internet memes, you'd know that. Formal semantics are great, they make pseud rhetoricians like yourself endlessly seethe, and out yourselves like the posers you are. This always brings a smile to my face.

Infinitesimals were not "invented" by Newton, Leibniz' differentials predated Newton's publishings. There have even been many conceptions of infinitesimals before these two, as far back as the Greeks. Additionally, calculus is the field of mathematics that deals with studying infinitesimals. They were not "invented" to fix calculus, calculus was established with them as a core axiom to provide infinite granularity over change (a shortcoming of some proto-calculus models)

Additionally, calculus is not a model of the universe and infinitesimals do not bridge the gap between mathematics and reality. Surreals are more important to math. But again, none of this has to do with propositional calculus, it is not mathematical calculus. Fucking goofball /lit/ poster, educate yourself.