/lit/ - Literature

Are there any philosophers who make the argument for the permissiveness of hebephilia?

Being a hebephile myself I’ve thought about this a lot and I can’t seem to get past the Kantian/rule utilitarian objection which states that, although individual hebephilic relationships can be fine, one has to consider the general impact on society if we permit hebephilia. Yes, it would allow true love and passion to flourish between those fettered souls in whom it sleeps; but it would also open up the possibility of manipulation and abuse of power in the more nefarious cases. So, just as we say it’s immoral for a teacher to bang his of-age student, not because this is immoral in itself, but because allowing these sorts of relationships would open the door to bribery, rape, manipulation, or biased grading—we also say it’s immoral for an adult to bang a pubescent teenager because of the reasons laid out above.

The only response I can conjure up to this is to say that we can make it law so that parental approval, contraception, and other failsafes are implemented, preventing abuse and ensuring that hebephilic relationships are as safe as any other, but this seems unlikely upon reflection.

So, which books would you recommend for me? plus points if they respond to the objection above.