/lit/ - Literature

>>12007894

>heraclitean subjectivism

dude, no. heraclitus has no robust philosophy of the self, not even close--and to call it "subjectivism" is just such a ludicrous anachronism that it goes to show that you dont know what either heraclitus or aristotle (who was notorious for misrepresenting ancient sources, anyway) was really after. you get closer viz. protogoras-plato route but this clearly is not what you're after.

i dunno, you come across as totally pedantic, like you use big words but to anyone who is actually educated it's clear you got a whiles to go

>>11945586