/lit/ - Literature

>>10467879
It is supposed to reflect the theme "transgressive", so no. I am interested in the aesthetics of it, since it reflects my childhood. I think the Chaos Gods reflect well the different ways in which one can be transgressive. I am more someone interested in decay, decline, filth, disease and suffering. I have my limits, never liked /b/, /r9k/ is sexually disgusting, and can't handle the hatred some /pol/acks have.

It is interesting that 4chan is still progressive in ways, a common aesthetic on /r9k/ and /pol/ is that of cyberpunk. Progressiveness is rejected, but not that of technological progress. I have grown up with post-apocalyptic aesthetics.

I'm not sure if I am pushing the term transgressive beyond its meaning or that of Nagle. For me it is not Georges Bataille or Marquis de Sade. Or American psycho. Rather it is Frankenstein, A Rebours, Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde, the Picture of Dorian Gray and Fight Club.

My pessimism reflects how I think the state of the environment is. Where I depart from mainstream environmentalists is that I see progression in nature, I see it adapting and transforming, but I think the same can't be said for humanity.