[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.10521134 [View]
File: 59 KB, 620x494, libertarianism.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
10521134

>>10513740

>> No.9447306 [View]
File: 54 KB, 620x494, YXW7qjamjXB2iBHsXZmywgXDlxR6XRrjSsPga6F-9ak.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
9447306

So we all know what the distinction between being right for the right reasons and being right for the wrong reasons is.

Is there a similar distinction between being wrong for the right reasons and being wrong for the wrong reasons? If yes, what would that enthrall?

Are there any good accessible epistemology books /lit/ can recommend that might deal with things like this?

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]