/lit/ - Literature

>>21283438
>What's he going to call it Heat 2?
did you not look at the title?

>>20195937
>I thought we were in agreement about the secret societies and cults
I have been arguing against this from the start of it being injected in here and since this post >>20195755 demanded to know what it contributes
>my evidence is a proclamation made by the Pope
ladies and gentlemen of the jury I implore you
>So yes, secret occult societies have a massive influence over the elite.
And your evidence for this?
They seek power.
And what does this have to do with the occult?
Your whole argument is this must lead to the occult.
Any evidence of what material impact this actually produces is just too absurd for you. Cause you're schizo. Or a shill.

>The first assignment in English One is called a Reading Reflection. It asks students to write about their reading habits: how often they read, what they read, what they feel they take from their reading.

>What have our students been reading before they come to our class? Some – a very few, and almost always women – have read 19th century classics: the Brontë sisters, Jane Austen, George Eliot, Charles Dickens.

>Some – a very few, and almost always men – have read 20th century science fiction (Asimov and his ilk), and some of the Beats and their offspring: Kerouac, Bukowski, Burroughs.

>The next and much larger group have read The Hunger Games, The Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-time, The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas, some or all of the Harry Potter series, and a lot of autobiographies, either by sportsmen (the men) or by women who have been held in dungeons for years by rapists (the women).

>The final group, about the same size as the group of Hunger Games readers, read their and their friends’ Facebook pages, their own news feed, and the occasional copy of a women’s or a men’s magazine. None, unless they have been made to by their high school English teacher, has read anything by an Australian author.

>>2347359