/lit/ - Literature

>>18548542


1. READ THE BIBLE —THE TRUE CATHOLIC ONE—, AND GO TO (CATHOLIC) CHURCH.

2. BUY: THE LITTLE FLOWERS OF SAINT FRANCIS, THE GOLDEN LEGEND, AND THE CATECHISM OF TRENT.

>>17604763
>I employed the term notions in the hegelian sense,
You ignore the Hegelian ideatic scheme.

>The term Hebrew is not merely a linguistic reference.
The burden of proof is on you to demonstrate how usage of/reference to the term: "Hebrew", is accurate beyond a linguistic context, rather than merely notional.

>The point is that you are wrong in every assertion you have made in our discussion.
>Anyhow, the idea is the same and you did not answer nothing related to the issue. And as I said all you do with Scripture is your own distirtions, to fit you phantasies.
If you do not have any counterarguments, nor anything pertinent to add, nor any requests for clarification, you should just stop posting.

>>16682931


1. THE «POOR IN SPIRIT» IS A FIGURE; IT DOES NOT MEAN: «THOSE WHO LACK SPIRIT», BUT, RATHER: «THOSE WHO ARE FIGURATIVELY "POOR"», SINCE THE WEALTHY ARE NOTIONALLY ASSOCIATED WITH SVPERBIA, AND, THE POOR, WITH HVMILITAS, AND IT IS THE HUMBLE WHO ARE GREAT IN GOD.

2. THE PASSAGE MEANS THAT THOSE WHO ARE AKIN TO «THE POOR», IN THAT THEY ARE HUMBLE, ARE THE ONES WHO ARE ONTOLOGICALLY APT FOR, AND WORTHY OF, ENTERING THE DIVINE PARADISE.