/lit/ - Literature

>>17820594
>It's not going to work however, because the most powerful and wealthy people in society have zero use for racism other than as a tool for the plebs to engage in petty squabbles.
They actually have a lot more use for 'antiracism' for that purpose. If you accept the IQ differences between populations, what policy and culture does that promote? It promotes raceblindness and judging individuals. Probably it promotes pushing the IQ differences under the rug, and trying to not talk about race much in mainstream discourse at all.

Antiracism on the other hand paints a very different picture. If the populations are actually equal then something has to be causing the massively disparate outcomes, and that something is White RacismTM, which makes the *entire* white population guilty in a kind of decentralized fashion. Very convenient way to get the proles to despise each other

>>16970394
>This creates a tension that makes it all the more difficult for workers to organize and cooperate towards what might be their best interest but not their employer's.

Corporations and elites know this very well and people from Aristotle to Putnam have noticed it too. Too bad many muricans are too brainwashed and treat immigrations and diversity like a religion. Love my local leftist party that cockblocks immigrant "reforms" (=flood the country with cheap workers) all the time.