/lit/ - Literature

Is virtue and duty something that should need to be argued for in terms of outcomes? Do we need to educate people of consequences and bribe people?

Or does a true justification for them lie within themselves?

Reminder not to trust anyone on Marx if they haven't read at least the Phenomenology of Spirit and Philosophy of Right

>Truly to escape Hegel involves an exact appreciation of the price we have to pay to detach ourselves from him. It assumes that we are aware of the extent to which Hegel, insidiously perhaps, is close to us; it implies a knowledge, in that which permits us to think against Hegel, of that which remains Hegelian. We have to determine the extent to which our anti-Hegelianism is possibly one of his tricks directed against us, at the end of which he stands, motionless, waiting for us.

Was Foucault right, is Hegel the final boss of philosophy?

Greg is based and the best kind of teacher any one of us could hope to get

What the fuck was his problem? Why couldn't he just get out with it?

The life of God and divine intelligence, then, can, if we like, be spoken of as love disporting with itself; but this idea falls into edification, and even sinks into insipidity, if it lacks the seriousness, the suffering, the patience, and the labour of the negative.

>tfw you catch the Absolute yanking it
>maybe it's better if some things weren't known after all

Thoughts on the most important writer of all time?

If I only wanted to read german philosophy till today (plus the greeks as a foundation) - what would be a good collection/order of works?

>>11038040
Confirmed for not having Absolute Knowledge of the Absolute