/lit/ - Literature

>>19661899
>Some of the greatest men in philosophy, literature, poetry, or art in general are free-masons...

HAHA; FALSE.


>... we profane...

PROFANE THEM.


YOU ARE, EITHER: A FREEMASONIC, NOT VERY GOOD SHILL, OR A DELUDED MORON.

>comfort book


>>>/r/eddit

>>18970507


REALISTS INVENTED, HAVE BUILT, AND BUILD, CIVILIZATION; IDEALISTS DESTROY IT; IDEALISM KILLS THE SOUL, ISOLATING IT TO THE METAPHYSICAL AMBIT, WHILST RENEGING OF THE PHYSICAL; REALISM ALLOWS ONE TO COGNIZE IT, RECOGNIZE IT, AND ACTUALIZE IT.

IF YOU READ «EL INGENIOSO HIDALGO DON QUIJOTE DE LA MANCHA», AND YOUR CONCLUSION IS: «CERVANTES WAS A SOULLESS FUCK» [SIC], YOU UNDERSTOOD NOTHING, AND ARE DELUDED.

>>18454936


IF YOU ARE SO PREOCCUPIED WITH BEING «POLITICALLY CORRECT», AND ARE IN A PERPETUAL STATE OF DREAD AT ANY POTENTIAL REACTIONS FROM GLOBALIST ENERGUMENOI AT SOME UNINTENTIONAL «TRANSGRESSION» IN YOUR WORK, YOU SHOULD STOP WRITING ANYTHING BEYOND BLOGPOSTS, AND BOARDPOSTS, BECAUSE YOU ARE A PUSILLANIMOUS, OVERSOCIALIZED IDIOT WHO MOST PROBABLY IS MEDIOCRE AT BEST.

NEITHER ANGLOIDS, NOR GERMANOIDS, COMPREHEND HERAKLITOS, THEREFORE THEY RESORT TO THE SKEWED LENS OF POSTMODERNISTIC, JUDAIZED SOPHISTRY IN A FUTILE ATTEMPT AT APPREHENSION, WHILST REGURGITATING NONSENSICAL DRIVEL IN THE PROCESS.

HERAKLITOS WAS NOT A RELATIVIST OF ANY TYPE; HE WAS NOT A NIHILIST; HE WAS NOT A FATALIST; HE WAS NOT AN ATOMIST, NOR A MONIST; HE WAS NOT AN «ANTISUBSTANTIALIST» —REGARDLESS OF WHATEVER THAT MEANS—; HE WAS NOT A PANTHEIST, ET CETERA —STOP DISTORTING HIS PHILOSOPHY, BARBARIANS.

ROMANTICISM IS A DIRECT CONTINUATION OF ILLUSTRISM: SAME NATURALISTIC, GODLESS WORLDVIEW, BUT MAWKISHLY SENTIMENTAL, AND PSYCHOLOGISTIC, INSTEAD OF CALLOUSLY EMPIRICAL, AND MECHANICISTIC.

HUMANS? IN THE MIDDLE OF THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY, WITH ILLUSTRISM, HUMANS DIED, AND HUMANITY WAS BORN; ROMANTICISM IS THE CASKET.

ANGLOIDS DO NOT COMPREHEND HERAKLITOS, THEREFORE THEY RESORT TO THE SKEWED LENS OF POSTMODERNISTIC, JUDAIZED SOPHISTRY IN A FUTILE ATTEMPT AT APPREHENSION, WHILST REGURGITATING NONSENSICAL DRIVEL IN THE PROCESS.

HERAKLITOS WAS NOT A RELATIVIST OF ANY TYPE; HE WAS NOT A NIHILIST; HE WAS NOT A FATALIST; HE WAS NOT AN ATOMIST, NOR A MONIST; HE WAS NOT A PANTHEIST, ET CETERA —STOP DISTORTING HIS PHILOSOPHY, BARBARIANS.

>Do NoT TRuST THoSe PaGaN, DeMoNiSTiC CuLTS; TRuST THiS oNe!


...

>>17932659

>SIGLOS XVI A XVII.

>«ANCIENT SPANISH».


...

...

«CREAM OF THE CROP».

>HOMOSEXUALITY.

>WHOLESOME.


...

MAY I REMIND YOU OF THE OBVIOUS? HOMOSEXUALITY IS REDUCED TO ONE MAN PENETRATING WITH HIS PENIS ANOTHER MAN'S ANVS, STIMULATING IT IN OSCILLATIVE MOTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF SENSUOUS PLEASURE —THERE IS NOTHING WHOLESOME IN THIS, BUT EVERYTHING MORBID.

HONESTLY, IF YOU SEE A THREAD IN WHICH THE ORIGINAL POSTER OPENS WITH: «IS IT ANY GOOD?», REGARDING SOMETHING TITLED: «THE SATANIC BIBLE», YOU INSTANTLY KNOW THAT THAT USER IS IN HIS LATE TEENS OF AGE, FROM A «PROTESTANT», OR AN ATHEISTIC, HOUSEHOLD —ULTIMATELY, WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE?—, AND UTTERLY LACKING IN SELFAWARENESS, AND SELFCONSCIOUSNESS.