/lit/ - Literature

>>23488259

>>22629979
>Show me an ethical problem that a scientist is more qualified to answer than a random guy on the street.
Pic rel.

>If you're going to say that it's not a scientists job, then whose? Nobody's? So ethics is just a fun free-for-all?
Exactly.

>Shall we start dismantling courts today since people are so obviously capable of governing themselves?
That would actually be an improvement. But your reasoning is flawed. Courts are not deciding based on ethics. They are deciding based on mostly unethical laws made by rich people.