/lit/ - Literature

I INFER THAT EPIPHANIES OCCUR WHEN CERTAIN PHYSIOLOGICAL, MENTAL, AND SENTIMENTAL, CONDITIONS COINCIDE.

HOW DO SUCH CONDITIONS COINCIDE, AND SPECIFICALLY WHAT KIND OF CONDITIONS ARE NECESSARY/REQUIRED? I DO NOT KNOW.

I HAVE ALREADY STATED SEVERAL TIMES THAT EPIPHANIES TEND TO OCCUR DURING RECTAL STIMULATION, EITHER DIRECT, OR INDIRECT, DURING DEFECATION, BUT THAT IS JUST ONE OF THE PHYSIOLOGICAL ASPECTS OF THE EPIPHANIC PROCESS; THE ULTIMATE CAUSES ARE STILL UNKNOWN TO ME, OR TO ANYONE ELSE CURRENTLY ALIVE THAT I KNOW.

1. ESSENCE IS NOT INTELLECTUAL, BUT SPIRITUAL.

2. THE PHYSICAL BODY IS MERELY AN INSTRUMENT, AND DEPENDING ON GENETICS, BIOLOGY, AND HOW YOU USE IT AND TAKE CARE OF IT, IT CAN BECOME AN ASSET, OR A LIABILITY.

>>7071291
>>7071342

TYPICALLY, PHILOSOPHY, AND AUTHENTIC PHILOSOPHERS, DO NOT ARISE WITHIN ESTABLISHED ACADEMIA; ALTHOUGH AUTHENTIC PHILOSOPHERS MAY WORK IN ACADEMIA, THEY ARE ESSENTIALLY EXTRANEOUS TO IT; IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN LIKE THIS.

YOU ARE PARTIALLY "RIGHT" THOUGH; THE CURRENT SOCIOCULTURAL MILIEU IN MÉXICO IS ONE OF MATERIALISTIC INDUSTRIALISM AND TECHNOLOGY, WHICH IS A COMPROMISE FOR THE SAKE OF SOCIOECONOMIC "PROGRESS" AT THE EXPENSE OF SOCIOCULTURAL DEVELOPMENT, AND AS A COMPENSATION FOR SOCIOPOLITICAL IMPOTENCE.

IN MÉXICO, THE PHILOSOPHICAL SPIRIT IS CURRENTLY INERT.

I AM "INTP"; I DO NOT HAVE ONE FAVOURITE BOOK; A "FAVOURITE SOMETHING" IS AN OVERLY EXCLUSIVE CLASSIFICATION, AND HAVING AN ABSOLUTE FAVOURITE BOOK ENTAILS NOT HAVING READ MANY BOOKS, OR THE BOOK BEING OVERLY SIGNIFICANT TO ONE.

http://ryzhknd.tumblr.com/psy

http://ryzhknd.tumblr.com/pol

>>6844771

IMMERSION IS DETRIMENTAL TO PERFECTION; IT SUBSUMES AND DILUTES CONSCIOUSNESS; IMMERSION INTERFERES WITH, AND ULTIMATELY PRECLUDES, THE CONTINUANCE OF ONTOLOGICAL EVOLUTION BY SUPPRESSING SELFAWARENESS, AND SELFCONSCIOUSNESS, THEREFORE STIFLING THE SOUL.

"IMMERSION": FROM LATIN "IN" ("IN", "INTO", "ON", "UPON"), AND "MERGERE" ("TO PLUNGE", "TO DIP", "TO DIVE"); "MERGERE" IS ALSO THE ROOT FOR THE ENGLISH WORD "MERGE" ("TO COMBINE", "TO BLEND"), THEREFORE IMMERSION SIGNIFIES A DIVING INTO SUBSTANCE, ENTAILING THE DISINTEGRATION OF BEING INTO NONBEING; ID EST: NOT A PROGRESSIVE NOBLE SYNTHESIS IN WHICH BEING BECOMES ITSELF, BUT RATHER A REGRESSIVE IGNOBLE ABSORPTION.

>>6803283
>Just out of curiosity, does anyone know why Hitler decided to use the phrase 'Aryan'?

THERE IS NO RECORDED INSTANCE OF ADOLF HITLER EVER USING THE TERM "ARYAN".

>>6803432
>... people before him...

TO WHAT "PEOPLE" ARE YOU REFERRING?

>... referred to the Nordic peoples as Aryan.

WHOMEVER EQUATES "NORDIC" WITH "ARYAN", OR VICEVERSA, IS A MORON, OR JUST IGNORANT; THE TERMS ARE NOT SYNONYMOUS, NOR DO THEY REFER TO THE SAME CONCEPT, OR PEOPLE.

>I think it's safe to say it was an easy way to connect with the common man, because the conservative revultion [SIC] had been taking place plus racial theories were extremely popular.

THAT IS SENSELESS.

>>6803432
>When people say "aryan"...

TO WHAT "PEOPLE" ARE YOU REFERRING?

>... they usually mean all indo-europeans, not just the iranic branch.

WHOMEVER EQUATES "ARYAN" WITH "INDOEUROPEAN", OR VICEVERSA, IS A MORON, OR JUST IGNORANT; THE TERMS ARE NOT SYNONYMOUS, NOR DO THEY REFER TO THE SAME CONCEPT —THE FORMER DENOTES BOTH, A PEOPLE, AND A CULTURE, THE LATTER DENOTES A LINGUISTIC CLASSIFICATION.

>>6803474

THERE IS NO ARYAN GENOTYPICAL CLASSIFICATION; NO CURRENT HAPLOGROUP IS "ARYAN":

1. WE DO NOT KNOW THE GENOTYPE OF THE ORIGINAL ARYANS.

2. HAPLOGROUPS ARE NOT INDICATIVE OF ARYANID ADMIXTURE.

>>6414376

"STATELY", IN THE OPENING SENTENCE OF "ULYSSES", IS USED AS AN ADVERB, NOT AS AN ADJECTIVE.

YOUR PASTICHE IS RENDERED INEFFECTUAL BY THIS BLUNDER.