/lit/ - Literature

>>4735502

Rooms in museums are exhibiting this dummheit.

For example, at meine universitat there is a "kunst gallery" where a there is a urinal signed '"R. Mutt". Mein Gott!

I try not to feel anger, but it's hard to accept that that sheissa gets into galleries, meanwhile there is an artist hundreds of times more talented in the Reich going unappreciated.

No.

“There is rarely a degeneration, a truncation or even a vice or any physical or moral loss without an advantage somewhere else.” This process occurs both socially and within individuals. Compensation for weakness leads to the creation of new values and skills. Decline/weakness/illness are in fact necessary for the development of such new values and thus for progress itself. Those who would try to eradicate illness in favour of pure ascent/strength/health do not realise the basis of those values in their opposite. This is because “constant development” only comes from “ennobling inoculation”, i.e. through the introduction of deviation/error which acts like a vaccine that protects society against more fatal illnesses including stagnation. However, this process of inoculation “will usually be opposed by… authority”. This is why the Nazis declared dada to be “degenerate art” without realising it was actually an inoculation against themselves and the barbarity of modernity.