/lit/ - Literature

>>18325754
>reading secondary sources

>>14417573
> naïve college students
I don't like his idea, therefore he is naive college student, that'll show him
> First he spoke about how ignorant people don't have an interest in voting
That's not what he said, he said said incentive system of democracy does not encourage voter be knowledgeable. But that ignorant people do vote all the time and govt ends up reflecting many of their will.
>His concept of 'fairness' suggests that he views it as being rooted in purely pragamatical principles instead of rather idealistic ones.
Because it does. Anarchy is the ideal system if we had ideal people and ideal world. All system of governance must be pragmatic while keeping as much as possible from ideal system.

He also talks about how democracy is in no sense ideal in any characterization of fairness. If you want truly democratically fair election, have everyone vote and then assign probability to each candidate according to vote and do a random draw with weighted value. That's democratically fair, but I don't see any of you advocating for that.
> shill audience
Nigga he is a libertarian against democracy speaking in Portland, the fucking antifa central.
> He presented multiple flawed analogies of democratic political systems and electorates, and his portrayal of them was yet another inadequate reductionism that would seem to simply disregard the possibility of their various factors and nuances
use more vague words, we'll believe you more