/lit/ - Literature

>Why do you have so much anxiety about writing anon? I thought you wanted to be a writer?

>Are you worried it will be a best seller?

>Are you worried it will be yet another in a long line of failures and wastes of time?

>Do you prefer to daydream about being a writer rather than writing itself?

Repeat after me, it's all vanity.

I wish I had never been born.
>what should I read?

Is it possible to be deep without people confusing it with being pretentious?

I mean, let's say Jesus came back. Obviously nobody would believe him because ironically you can't talk about the flaws of society, or rather there being a need to of love each other, without being compared to Jesus in some sort of ad hominem attack that tries to deconstruct the argument without addressing the point. Jesus would fail just because he is compared to an artificial image of himself and every word that mirrors said image is therefor perceived as artificial.

It seems like most folks can't tell the difference between greatness and pretentiousness and choose the latter in default because they're unable to conceive the extra ordinary. In terms of Jesus he's not trying to be Jesus. He doesn't pretend, he just is.

Considering films and literature are describing the same thing through different means, which approach do you consider the most pure?

By writing you lazy, uninspired, filthy, stupid, fucking Buddy

read this

then fuck off

>>4382092
writer's block

Do you believe writer's block actually exists?

I don't know, kinda share the opinions of this comic.