/lit/ - Literature

>>17134212
because most "actual" leftists drink the identity politics kool aid, meaning that they might as well be liberals cause they serve the same purpose: cuck pawns for the oligarchy. These people don't know the difference between a posturing lib and a leftist, and if they do they're too scared to say anything cause then they're non-incluisive, a "gatekeeper" or some other no no thing. There is a growing portion of leftists who reject idpol (thanks to redscare and chapo) but really it's on a superficial level (really they just want to call people 'retard') but they're largely faggots who wear ideology as fashion just like the posturing libs. These people don't actually do anything. Then there's an even smaller subset of leftists who fully reject idpol. These people don't talk politics.
people with ideology's cock down their throat are retards. I don't take anyone who says that they're a communist/socialist/nazi/accelerationist/any ideological label seriously unless I know they've done the work to figure it out. Everyone else is a faggot who feels the need to put themselves into a category so they know what to think.