/lit/ - Literature

>>22168312
>le IQ

>learning anything from american authors

>existential pessimistic nihilism

Heh. If I green my text, it is more >official. It shows I am of a high enough stature to speak of topics which lesser non-green texting beings cannot fathom.

>>15767792
>It's 'if I were'.
>Stupid frogposter.

>>15441713

>>15381726
>only euros are racist

>>15154306
>Currently, I watch a candle burn for half an hour every morning

>>15145413
>if your friends walked off of a cliff, would you do it too?
>Yes

>>14926039
You don't have to worry, brainlets have little to fear as they're too stupid to be affected by any knowledge, for good or ill.

>>14707256
>And any man who accumulates wealth must have some sort of skill.

>>14566020

>>14554642
>Stoicism is a lot more dangerously complicated subject than I had initially thought.

>>14403861
>>14403825

>>14019349
>>14019460

>>13940443
>philosophers described it thus they invented it

>>13529757
>if god unreal how miracles like childbirth happen?

>>13253476
https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1914/mar/11.htm

>This is the reasoning of a liberal scholar who repeats the incredibly trite and threadbare argument that experience and reason clearly prove that men are not equal, yet socialism bases its ideal on equality. Hence, socialism, if you please, is an absurdity which is contrary to experience and reason, and so forth!

>Mr. Anon repeats the old trick of the reactionaries: first to misinterpret socialism by making it out to be an absurdity, and then to triumphantly refute the absurdity! When we say that experience and reason prove that men are not equal, we mean by equality, equality in abilities or similarity in physical strength and mental ability.

>It goes without saying that in this respect men are not equal. No sensible person and no socialist forgets this. But this kind of equality has nothing whatever to do with socialism. If Mr. Anon is quite unable to think, he is at least able to read; were lie to Lake the well-known work of one of the founders of scientific socialism, Frederick Engels, directed against Dühring, he would find there a special section explaining the absurdity of imagining that economic equality means anything else than the abolition of classes. But when professors set out to refute socialism, one never knows what to wonder at most—their stupidity, their ignorance, or their unscrupulousness.

>>13243304
There's a few good ones

I've been writing again but it's mostly shit

I finally finished a scanner darkly about two weeks ago lads.

I didnt want it to end, I weeped a bit at the end

>>13080760
>Yuropoor
>lives in a third world shithole

ok then

>>12668947

>>12655781
>hey dood, lern 2 tink
>doesnt understand one of the most simple paradoxes