/lit/ - Literature

NOTHING CAN STOP JASON BRYAN
FOOLISH MORTALS

oh boy, new &amp lessgooooo

>>18097046
holy fuck who is this edgy dude who doesn't follow the crowd or trends and how do i make him governor of my pussy

>>17085024
Eat shit faggot don’t forget to kill yourself on the way out.

>>17031231
hey i'm the guy that was having difficulties, just wanna say thanks, i took the digital download off and i was able to buy without registering

>>17031133
after several hours i never received the confirmation email, but at the same time i gotta be honest with you and say i was too lazy to find out if there was a source of asking for another confirmation

>>12168730
good post thank you

>>12168516
well deserve (you) my man

it's true. these zombies that drudge their way through life on autopilot are the saddest thing. i feel sorry for their children. raising a child without having read the canon first ought to be called child abuse.

>OP delivering
Is this 2010? Very based of you to do it OP

>>12006275
>woman writes about complex but ultimately rewarding social experience(s)

>>9987348
All trash.

https://www.abebooks.com/Beau-Marot-Praise-Music-Language-Hofstadter/11071458722/bd

This signed first edition of Le Ton beau de Marot is probably the most reasonable piece of "expensive" literature that I could ever wish for.

>>9679593
She looks like she gives a mean blowie

>>8791322
>mfw

man that was a good one. take care sir

Anyone else find Middle English far more beautiful and pleasurable to ear, heart and tongue than Modern or Early Modern English?

>>7918256
Well, now I'm excited.

>/lit/ spends 11 hours arguing about a question that's literally answered on its own wikipedia question in a couple of paragraphs

>>5619468
>a phrase
>being called a buzzword

>>5570799
>>5575477

How does one know whether they have nothing to say or whether they have not experienced enough to have inspired writing?

>>4630950
>does this criticism of free will make sense?
No.

>we cannot control our control
Seriously? Are you dumb? "Control" implies authority, if "X" controls "Y" then "X" is the authority. If "Z" controls "X", then "X" does not have authority or control, "Z" does and exercises this control through "X". Saying "we cannot control our control" is a meaningless statement. If you couldn't control your "control" (although this statement is in itself meaningless even out of context because "control" is not an object here, and cannot be controlled) then you wouldn't have it, it wouldn't be control.

It's also meaningless from a grammatical perspective.
>But we cannot control our control
>But we cannot run our run
>But we cannot verb our verb

How did this thread even get more than 5 replies?