/lit/ - Literature

>>22214427
fuck you

well this has been fun.

>>21813028
>morals
>ethos
Start with the 32 Virtues of the Roman Republic and the corresponding Vices. I mean, you're talking about Virtue in self-conduct.

> my entire sense of morality is generally derived by just googling “Catholic teaching on xyz”
Oh that's easy; discover that the Pope was a Heretic and that Catholicism was always a pretender against the Emperor. But the real value, I think, comes from noticing that europeans have been seeking excuses to invent new guilt and absurdist dogmas to persecute themselves with for centuries, as if this lunacy is deep in the psyche; compare todays witch hunts and social creeds of madness to the same, when the ideology was more bent towards playacting as a jew for the sake of actual literal immortality... and how very little anything to do with abramic religion has to do with practicing virtue or avoiding vice.

>ethics
ethos is derived from ethnos, as the word itself, and doesn't relate to virtue or morales; "ethics" is a misnomer and more literally would have referred to ethic racial cultural habit back in the day.

I also found it helpful to drop the word morality entirely and just think in terms of the virtues themselves, far more comprehensive.

>>21739792
>one of those morons ever read the Bib
doesn't dawn on you for a moment that an atheist in La West is 99% going to be a former christian (probably someone raised christian much more than yourself) who know the bible better than you, little turd boy, ..does it

I mean, your takes are always so basic, you know? like you've not really thought it through or read deeply enough or know the history of a thing...

not you personally, you know what mean..
(well obviously you personally hahah)

>>21740699
jesus christ

>>21739744
>the imaginary criticism you have in your head is one of the main points The Christ came to earth to address?
oh and there's all of us thinking he was a would-be reformer for the barbarian jews

> the imaginary criticism you have in your head is one of the main points The Christ came to earth to address
xD LITERALLY WTF FFFFFF XD oh the way you phrased that. you poor simple idiot

like.. not only is jesus literally god, but he literally came to earth to 'prove torah was true' wtf...? oh fucking hell -you're lucky i have work to go to this morning or i'd be here all day to 'dunk' on you, catheterolic

>no response
ha. another victory against chaos.

i'm saddened that nobody noticed the "don't remove your rags more than once in five years (or you'll become crippled / get black death)" bits.

yey not banned
Emperor is go

>>21553368
>The irony being, of course, that the Emperor himself derives his powers from the warp
no he doesn't.

The webway is old eldar tech and 'chaos' didn't exist until the eldar fucked it into being; whereas.. eh.. idk, this is cartoony. see the post above where i dunk this cartoony shit version into a prometheum vat.

>>21553635
>The Emperor isn’t an atheist,
fucking lol. It's literally atheism; "no gods" or "these beings you emotionalistic lunatics worship 'as' gods are maggots" is more accurate.

>>21300501
Hello again false-flagging, anon, have you got anymore unprovoked threats of death for me again today or are you just going to content yourself to flag this topic down again cos you're terrified of /rhetoric/ for your own political reasons..? lawl

Mad, int. col. : "to be angry" (in part a correct medical terminology)
(lit. "to be mentally ill, to be overly-led by pathos, to suffer from a cognitive impairment or mental retardation which produces aggressive verbal or physical responses")
(see: Schizo, Poltroon)

>>21047325
>THE WORK OF SAINT THOMAS OF AQUINAS, AND THE WORK OF LUIS DE MOLINA
I DO NOT PAY ATTENTION TO YOUTUBERS BECAUSE THE ADVERTS ARE ANNOYING.

>>21045489
explains how to avoid political, religious, con artistry and emotional manipulation; is told is an autistic retard that abandons all thinking.

I deduce you believe some nonsense no. 21045489 which has scrambled your vocabulary through compartmentalization of contradictory ideas; now, is the nonsense you believe political or religious?

oi cawnt b'leeve nobody loiks moi bludy poems

>>20982998
>you have built up your identity around being a nurse
I'm not a nurse, schizo. I don't "teach language in a hospital" either.

> because he identifies with his job.
It's because I'm completely qualified in this subject 'for' my job that I possess a far better grasp of these things than you do; this means I can recognize when you're bringing up some baseline basic thing and proclaiming it to be "all important" that I can tell you're an idiot who hasn't completed or begun an education on the subject, beyond glancing at wikipedia.

Your persistent hostility 'and' refusal to speak nicely and normally with me is a trait that you're a psychotic. Whilst your use of inversion and copying my own descriptions of you and my own arguments for the subject, passing them off as your own after I've said them, is a trait that you're a schizophrenic engaging in prolonged and sustained gas-lighting to damage the morale of the person you're talking to (me in this case), except I'm smarter than to take you seriously and recognize what you've been doing.

>What you told me "projection" means is a concrete example of you being completely delusional,
My use of the term was perfectly acceptable, if you simply didn't find it as literally the first thing that came up on your googlesearch (although I test this and it did come up) is not my problem.


This is hyper-literalism on your part, which is a trait of a cognitive processing disorder or a childlike or simply uneducated person.

> allows you to completely misuse every concept
Yes, the same hyper-literalism seems to have been behind every single line of attack you've employed, over these last few days.

You're upsetting yourself, is all that's going on. Hence the 'pathos' in psycho+pathos.


> I assumed you would disagree but you can't even grasp any alternative idea
hilarious. I've told you for the last 3 replies that you're arguing for me to accept something that I agreed with in the first place. I'm a retard because I won't fight with you about some minor autistic aspect that you think is super important; and if I don't think it's important or if I agree with it, you don't notice what I say, and tell me I'm actually "brain-dead".

>I'm not going to read more
No, go on, keep going. We'd gotten to the part where I told you that we were agreeing with each other and you want to just stay angry?

>. I feel deeply sorry for the people you work with, it's criminal
Anon, I get the strong impression that you're going to be one of the people I work with one day. Based on (everything you've been raving at me about for five or so days) it's only a matter of time before you end up on a psych ward. You're highly strung and fit to snap. I've seen it 100 times. The cognitive impairments, the regurgitation of other peoples words, the constant verbal abuse, the refusal to find common ground, the hyper-literalism, the sophisticated gas-lighting techniques.


I know it's killing you that none of it has worked on me =)