/lit/ - Literature

>>14236326
> Your attempts at humor are one dimensional at best, and even then fall flat. Surely you know deep down none of what you posted was the least bit stimulatory, let alone revealing. You are a thread bumper, the imageboard equivalent of the guy who washes the fluffer's mouth with Gatorade. Why would "Elliot Roger" or "supreme gentlemen" references affect someone? Did you think these have some power? I'm here to tell you they label you in perhaps a way you do not perceive. Read more, Anon. This place seems to be rotting you.