/lit/ - Literature

>>12997178
Also, many people have critiqued the doc i linked so what I say to you is: do you own research take what you think is good;throw out the bad. The chart imo is fine very exhaustive but its not terrible. Don't take everything said literally and just go by your own time. Also, its bullshit if anyone tells you, you need to read "x","x" and "x" to read "x" you can read whatever you want and work for an understanding through secondary literature. In uni you start on the greeks yes but professors know what information to feed you and when so they wont have reading whole books but rather important sections needed for you to progress and or learn as a necessity.

>>12990324
Neuromancer was written without gibson ever touching a computer Bran Stoker never visited Romanian.....etc etc just write to your hearts desire who gives a fuck

>>12962627
i literally replied to your post saying that what you said did not matter and you immediately got butt hurt and drew up a bunch of random shit and came to wild assumptions, how am I making myself feel better by trolling and what do you mean by this? sounds like serious cope dude