/lit/ - Literature

>>4681619
Is that what they're called

Why are there so many in the first place

All of you faggots are muking up the thread, you don't discuss you just post funny greentexts about obvious flaws in books.

>>4565782
>Hey guys i reached a dry spell
>post your work
>i'm not gonna plagiarize or anything
>i promise

>>3908794
The Anita Blake series is or should i say was a great series... It had world depth, good use of powers and ability and a great wildlife(it was like they lived in a realm where magic was real and the animals could be explained).
Then.... idk wtf happened, she was this born again virgin after her fiance dumped her because /pol/ didn't like her[ no lie the mother was a racist and because Anita's hair was a curly brunette and her eyes not blue she threaten to cut off her son financially if he didn't dump Anita.], then... idk all of a sudden she goes and passes up the vag to the vampire... then hair texture is repeated like 50 times thenceforth in every reoccurring book .....

My thoughts are that Anita's Author was a ghost writer, then Laurell took over and didn't know that there are things called proof readers.... the repetition.. and utter nonsense...

Her 23rd or 22nd book came out a few days ago i saw that a bunch of people had given it 5 stars and the book wasn't even out yet.... The book is like 50 Shades of Graves(get it vampires)

What is /lit/'s thoughts? Writers that milk shit for all that its worth.
She doesn't proof read, she describes hair and feel over 50 times in each book, her plot is non existent, bunch of sex where it is not needed, sex in general, deleting people off like forums(like apple does) when anyone says anything slightly negative e.g "Why is sex the main plot for the recent books", if you say anything negative at all or says that some parts in the book makes no sense(again no proof reader) she says that you are attacking her and her minions swarm.

Anita Blake FUCKING DROPPED.


You guys have any books that started off good but turned into idk wtf happened?
Do you know of any popular writer that started the series with a ghost writer then had to continue it themselves?

>my face when trying to read Hamlet

Ok I'm not natively English but people understand that old English stuff?

Take this for example:

HAMLET
O, that this too too solid flesh would melt
Thaw and resolve itself into a dew!
Or that the Everlasting had not fix'd
His canon 'gainst self-slaughter! O God! God!
How weary, stale, flat and unprofitable,
Seem to me all the uses of this world!
Fie on't! ah fie! 'tis an unweeded garden,
That grows to seed; things rank and gross in nature
Possess it merely. That it should come to this!
But two months dead: nay, not so much, not two:
So excellent a king; that was, to this,
Hyperion to a satyr; so loving to my mother
That he might not beteem the winds of heaven
Visit her face too roughly. Heaven and earth!

>>2838047
I jest you not /lit/ i have seen this same, exact thread 5 times now with the same or similar wording on the front page.
Op why do you keep reposting this?

>>2779778
And you are right. There is no point. Almost everyone fears death for some reason or another. That's why it's fucking death. A dog won't jump off a cliff because he instinctively knows something bad could happen. It's the same for humans.

We are just animals, all the same. That's what that retard "neitchze" poster doesn't understand; we are animals and have survival instincts, even if we wish we weren't born ffs.
>his face when

>>2446748
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flowers_in_the_Attic
What the fuck am i reading?

>>2035865
Are you
>>2035780
?

>>1940792
>moral nihilist

cannabis has been known to cure cancer,
http://www.cannabisculture.com/articles/5169.html

Stereotypical thing to say, but all of you go watch The Union right now

私はたわごとの日本語を話すことはできません笑

I don't even know why Carl Sagan is famous.

>>1477777

>>1415058
It's time to stop posting.

Manga Shakespeare