[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:

View post   
>> No.19861520 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, Minor_classics_which_are_better_than_most_classics.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19861520

What are some books that deserve more attention?

>> No.19746650 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, Minor_classics_2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
19746650

Could somebody please provide me with a list of the books on this image?

The genius making the image forgot the resize properly which makes most titles completely unintelligible.

>> No.17790133 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, 1594616157721.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
17790133

>>17789071
Here ya go weeb

>> No.16896947 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, thumbnail_1594616157721.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16896947

Requesting full size version of this
Also chart thread

>> No.16558156 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, 1598672298951.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16558156

Anyone have a higher res version of this? I can read less than half of these titles

>> No.16347742 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, minorclassics.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16347742

>>16347694
now read these

>> No.16239447 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, A7DB7258-EF25-4636-915F-EDEEF4787A87.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16239447

>> No.16231549 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, minorclassics.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
16231549

>> No.15845956 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, underrated classics.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15845956

What books do you consider to be as good as any classic but aren't as well known?

>> No.15744961 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, 1578140474409.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15744961

>> No.15598345 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, Minor_classics_which_are_better_than_most_classics.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15598345

Does anyone have a higher quality version of this?

>> No.15439186 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, Minor_classics_which_are_better_than_most_classics.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15439186

help me identify all of these books (the picture is too low-res and some of the titles are unreadable). also what are some minor classics beside these?

>> No.15318537 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, 1578140474409.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15318537

>> No.15234561 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, Minor_classics_which_are_better_than_most_classics.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
15234561

stumbled upon this low quality chart, and wanted to know if it is just a random guy collection or are these really worthy titles?

>> No.14910627 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, minor.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14910627

>>14910622
whoops lol meant to post this

>> No.14893921 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, minor.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14893921

>> No.14565248 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, minor classics.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14565248

>>14565245
Minor classics

>> No.14471835 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, 1574627756534.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14471835

>> No.14228678 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, minor classics which are better than most classics.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
14228678

>> No.13847654 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, minor.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13847654

Does anyone have a higher quality version of this pic?

>> No.13843127 [View]
File: 1.07 MB, 923x712, minor.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
13843127

I just put this together hope you guys like it

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]