[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/lit/ - Literature

Search:


View post   

>> No.20445482 [View]
File: 25 KB, 554x554, images - 2022-05-30T224712.982.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
20445482

Is Jay Dyer a wolf in sheep's clothing, teaching what would essentialy be reducible to pseudo-metaphysics, when I used to watch him about 2 years ago or something like this, when I was far less well-read, what always irked me was that nonsense that the "Trinity" was the solution to the "many and the one," now after a while after I've read metaphysics rooted in a more comprehensive study of traditional authors I can see the total nonsense in Dyers misrepresentations of "metaphysics" and theology, especially after reading Guénon, the "Transcendental argument," the "many and the one talk," the Trinity - in the way Dyer characterised it, the whole "image" with the bookshelves and such, to essentialy give off this impression of being well read, that npc "presuppositionalism," muh logical fallacies, the whole egoistic larping of these religionists, that whole rubbish about
>you have to study philosophy and religion in a university to get good and understand!
I thank /lit/ for at least pointing me in the direction of authors like Guénon (pbuh), Shankacharya, Schuon and Coomaraswamy, evangelists of any kind now seem like the blind leading the blind, the Muslim evangelistic arguments all are equally relative

Most of these youtube Evangelists are either deluded, or they are major gatekeepers, but their devotees lap their rubbish up in the youtube comments, I realise now that most religion and philosophy in this sense is just emotional consolation driven by sentiment, or at best just an elaborate exercise in discursion, all things considered its totally unimpressive.

The neopagan rubbish too about
>muh abrahamism bad! Worship your own ego while paying homage to names and forms and concepts in your mind, depending on archaeology!
Is essentialy tantamount to a sort of degenerate superstition, such people are just in it for entertainment, whar for me is a source of entertainment is the amount of neopagan posers who pretend to be in sync with tradition and metaphysics.

This video does well to trace where Dyer got the "unorthodox" idea of "many and one" being "solved" by the Trinity, and so on.
https://youtu.be/GC0IUAApMKM

I made this thread, because I wanted to see if other people know of any obvious "pseudo-metaphysician" evangelists, - can be of any religion, who they once watched when ignorant and didn't know what to think, all personally just for a source of entertainment, it could be a Muslim, Christian or whatever, who poses as this "intellectual" type, "theologian" or whatever else, from my position of acquired insight they have become a total entertainment of sorts, it's like watching some pretend shows of NPCs Clinging desperately to their pride, with their touted university degrees, or whatever else, the large majority of them are mere children. The best of them can arrive at well there is the indeterminable "One" with indefinite relative Principles, and through this or that yoga we can realise that our Jīvātman is one with it.

Navigation
View posts[+24][+48][+96]